How Does Living in Temporary Accommodation and the COVID-19 Pandemic Impact under 5s' Healthcare Access and Health Outcomes? A Qualitative Study of Key Professionals in a Socially and Ethnically Diverse and Deprived Area of London.

Background: Children < 5 years living in temporary accommodation (U5TA) are vulnerable to poor health outcomes. Few qualitative studies have examined service provider perspectives in family homelessness; none have focused on U5TA with a cross-sector approach. This study explored professionals' perspectives of the barriers and facilitators, including pandemic-related challenges, experienced by U5TA in accessing healthcare and optimising health outcomes, and their experiences in delivering services. Methods: Sixteen semi-structured online interviews were conducted. Professionals working in Newham (London) with U5TA families were recruited from non-profit organisations, the health sector, and Local Authority. A thematic analysis was conducted. Findings: Professionals described barriers including poor parental mental health; unsuitable housing; no social support; mistrust of services; immigration administration; and financial insecurity. Digital poverty, language discordance, and the inability to register and track U5TA made them even less visible to services. Professionals tried to mitigate barriers with improved communication, and through community facilitators. Adverse pandemic effects on U5TA health included delay and regression in developmental milestones and behaviours. In-person services were reduced, exacerbating pre-existing barriers. Interpretation: COVID-19 further reduced the ability of professionals to deliver care to U5TA and significantly impacted the lives of U5TA with potential life-long risks. Innovative and tailored cross-sector strategies are needed, including co-production of public health services and policies focusing on early development, mental health support, employment training, and opportunities for parents/carers.

How did living in temporary accommodation during the COVID-19 pandemic affect children younger than 5 years' access to health care and health outcomes? A qualitative study of key professionals in a socially and ethnically diverse and deprived area of London.

BACKGROUND: Children younger than 5 years living in temporary accommodation due to homelessness (U5TA) are extremely vulnerable to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Few qualitative studies have examined provider perspectives in family homelessness, but none focused on U5TA specifically. We aimed to qualitatively explore professionals' perspectives of pandemic-related challenges and barriers experienced by U5TA in accessing health care and optimising health outcomes, and their experiences of delivering U5TA services. METHODS: 16 semi-structured interviews were done online. Professionals working in the London Borough of Newham with U5TA families were purposively sampled and recruited from non-profit organisations, the health sector, and local authority. A thematic codebook approach was used to analyse the data combining inductive and deductive codes using an adapted socioecological model as a guiding theoretical framework. FINDINGS: Two non-profit organisation professionals, seven health visitors, one GP, therapist, dietician, nurse, public health consultant, and two social workers from the local authority's No Recourse to Public Funds team described adverse pandemic effects on U5TA health: delay and regression in developmental milestones and behaviours-eg, toileting, feeding skills, emotional regulation, and social-communication skills. Pre-existing systemic barriers were exacerbated during the pandemic when the reduction of in-person services with professionals necessitated remote delivery of health and social care services. Differential effects of digital poverty, language discordance, and inability to register and track U5TA rendered this population invisible to services. Professionals highly agreed that barriers to optimal health outcomes and service access included poor mental health, unsuitable housing, no social support, mistrust of mainstream services, immigration administration, financial insecurity, and loss of informal jobs among U5TA families. Professionals sometimes mitigated these barriers with good communication skills, developing trusting relations, and through community facilitators. INTERPRETATION: COVID-19 widened health inequalities and inequities, substantially affecting the lives of U5TA and ability of professionals to deliver quality care to U5TA. Innovative and tailored cross-sector strategies, including co-production of public health services, are required. Policies and services urgently need to focus on early development, mental health support, employment training, and opportunities for parents and carers, plus unambiguous definitions of what is deemed suitable accommodation and actionable planned steps to ensure enforcement. FUNDING: None.

The Impact of the Pandemic on Mental Health in Ethnically Diverse Mothers: Findings from the Born in Bradford, Tower Hamlets and Newham COVID-19 Research Programmes.

Restrictions implemented by the UK Government during the COVID-19 pandemic have served to worsen mental health outcomes, particularly amongst younger adults, women, those living with chronic health conditions, and parents of young children. Studies looking at the impact for ethnic minorities have reported inconsistent findings. This paper describes the mental health experiences of mothers from a large and highly ethnically diverse population during the pandemic, using secondary analysis of existing data from three COVID-19 research studies completed in Bradford and London (Tower Hamlets and Newham). A total of 2807 mothers participated in this study with 44% White British, 23% Asian/Asian British Pakistani, 8% Other White and 7% Asian/Asian British Bangladeshi backgrounds. We found that 28% of mothers experienced clinically important depressive symptoms and 21% anxiety symptoms during the pandemic. In unadjusted analyses, mothers from White Other, and Asian/Asian British Bangladeshi backgrounds had higher odds of experiencing symptoms, whilst mothers from Asian/Asian British Indian backgrounds were the least likely to experience symptoms. Once loneliness, social support and financial insecurity were controlled for, there were no statistically significant differences in depression and anxiety by ethnicity. Mental health problems experienced during the pandemic may have longer term consequences for public health. Policy and decision makers must have an understanding of the high risk of financial insecurity, loneliness and a lack of social support on mother's mental health, and also recognise that some ethnic groups are far more likely to experience these issues and are, therefore, more vulnerable to poor mental health as a consequence.

Parental mental health and associations between living in temporary accommodation and socio-political determinants during the COVID-19 pandemic

576 Figure 1Is the adjusted odds ratio (OR) plot showing the odds of an increased rank of depression severity with living in Temporary Accommodation as the main exposure and each predictior variable given all the other variables were held constant in the model[Figure omitted. See PDF] 576 Figure 2Is the adjusted odds ratio (OR) plot showing the odds of an increased rank of anxiety severity with living in temporary accommodation as the main exposure and each predictior variable given all the other variables were held constant in the model[Figure omitted. See PDF]22.9% and 20.0% of TA parents/caregivers had severe anxiety and moderate anxiety compared to 4.0% and 25.0% of non-TA parents/caregivers, respectively. For parents/caregivers living in TA, the odds of a more severe anxiety rank were 2.46 times higher (95%CI:1.27–4.75). Other significant factors for anxiety were: Very Low Food Security (OR 4.45, 95%CI:3.26–6.08);families ‘finding it very difficult’ financially (OR 1.62, 95%CI:0.96–2.73). [Figure 2]ConclusionFamilies living in TA had a greater odds of poor parental mental health outcomes, which was further compounded by factors including NRPF status, financial insecurity, food insecurity and poor housing environments. Poor parental mental health is an adverse childhood experience (ACE) directly impacting both the health and wellbeing of the parent and child throughout the life course. Targeted policies and tailored community-based mental health strategies, including the co-location of mental health and housing support within settings already accessed by TA families with under 5s, are vitally needed, since this vulnerable group is at higher risk of poorer parental mental health and a higher ACE count, which is exacerbated by the unsuit ble and unsafe TA environment.

Socio-political determinants of health inequalities during the COVID-19 pandemic: Under 5s and their families living in temporary accommodation in a socially diverse and deprived population—Newham, East London

605 Figure 1Comparisons Between TA and Non-TA Families: Socio-political Determinants[Figure omitted. See PDF] 605 Table 1Health care access: comparison of non-TA and TA families n (%)ConclusionTA children were increasingly disadvantaged among multiple domains: socio-demographics, food insecurity, inadequate/poor housing, health service access. Therefore, the need is urgent to minimise the potential lifelong health impacts of these socio-political determinants of health experienced by this vulnerable group in addition to tackling the immediate risks arising from issues such as digital exclusion and poor housing conditions, which were likely exacerbated during the pandemic. The future of the pandemic is uncertain and future lockdowns are possible, so all families must have digital access now that many vital health services and schooling are online, even some exclusively. The time families spend in TA must be reduced, and the co-production of interim solutions and future policies to ensure a minimum set of housing standards for TA should be made a priority to address these inequalities and inequities.

Indirect impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic at two tertiary neonatal units in Zimbabwe and Malawi: an interrupted time series analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To examine indirect impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on neonatal care in low-income and middle-income countries. DESIGN: Interrupted time series analysis. SETTING: Two tertiary neonatal units in Harare, Zimbabwe and Lilongwe, Malawi. PARTICIPANTS: We included a total of 6800 neonates who were admitted to either neonatal unit from 1 June 2019 to 25 September 2020 (Zimbabwe: 3450; Malawi: 3350). We applied no specific exclusion criteria. INTERVENTIONS: The first cases of COVID-19 in each country (Zimbabwe: 20 March 2020; Malawi: 3 April 2020). PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in the number of admissions, gestational age and birth weight, source of admission referrals, prevalence of neonatal encephalopathy, and overall mortality before and after the first cases of COVID-19. RESULTS: Admission numbers in Zimbabwe did not initially change after the first case of COVID-19 but fell by 48% during a nurses' strike (relative risk (RR) 0.52, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.66, p<0.001). In Malawi, admissions dropped by 42% soon after the first case of COVID-19 (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.70, p<0.001). In Malawi, gestational age and birth weight decreased slightly by around 1 week (beta -1.4, 95% CI -1.62 to -0.65, p<0.001) and 300 g (beta -299.9, 95% CI -412.3 to -187.5, p<0.001) and outside referrals dropped by 28% (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.85, p<0.001). No changes in these outcomes were found in Zimbabwe and no significant changes in the prevalence of neonatal encephalopathy or mortality were found at either site (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The indirect impacts of COVID-19 are context-specific. While our study provides vital evidence to inform health providers and policy-makers, national data are required to ascertain the true impacts of the pandemic on newborn health.

Development and implementation experience of a learning healthcare system for facility based newborn care in low resource settings: The Neotree.

Introduction: Improving peri- and postnatal facility-based care in low-resource settings (LRS) could save over 6000 babies' lives per day. Most of the annual 2.4 million neonatal deaths and 2 million stillbirths occur in healthcare facilities in LRS and are preventable through the implementation of cost-effective, simple, evidence-based interventions. However, their implementation is challenging in healthcare systems where one in four babies admitted to neonatal units die. In high-resource settings healthcare systems strengthening is increasingly delivered via learning healthcare systems to optimise care quality, but this approach is rare in LRS. Methods: Since 2014 we have worked in Bangladesh, Malawi, Zimbabwe, and the UK to co-develop and pilot the Neotree system: an android application with accompanying data visualisation, linkage, and export. Its low-cost hardware and state-of-the-art software are used to support healthcare professionals to improve postnatal care at the bedside and to provide insights into population health trends. Here we summarise the formative conceptualisation, development, and preliminary implementation experience of the Neotree. Results: Data thus far from ~18 000 babies, 400 healthcare professionals in four hospitals (two in Zimbabwe, two in Malawi) show high acceptability, feasibility, usability, and improvements in healthcare professionals' ability to deliver newborn care. The data also highlight gaps in knowledge in newborn care and quality improvement. Implementation has been resilient and informative during external crises, for example, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We have demonstrated evidence of improvements in clinical care and use of data for Quality Improvement (QI) projects. Conclusion: Human-centred digital development of a QI system for newborn care has demonstrated the potential of a sustainable learning healthcare system to improve newborn care and outcomes in LRS. Pilot implementation evaluation is ongoing in three of the four aforementioned hospitals (two in Zimbabwe and one in Malawi) and a larger scale clinical cost effectiveness trial is planned.

Mitigating the severity of child homelessness in the UK: a global mixed-methods systematic review

Background In 2019, 585 000 children in England were homeless or at risk of becoming homeless. The pressure of the COVID-19 pandemic on the health-care delivery system has amplified the inequalities faced by marginalised children. Although the UK has had a series of successful health sector reforms, few have designed or implemented strategies that target reach, access, and use of public health services for marginalised children. This project aims to identify such strategies by exploring solutions used in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), through reverse-innovation. Methods We undertook a systematic review of the literature published in English from PubMed, MEDLINE, and SCOPUS between Jan 1, 2010, and March 31, 2021. We explored the literature focusing on policy, strategy, intervention, and services, using keywords and Medical Subject Headings corresponding to the target population, and medical, health, and nutrition services including preventive and immunisation services, and outcomes. Our target population included homeless and marginalised children. We defined marginality in terms of social distances following Braun and Gatzweiler (2013). We included in our search homelessness, temporary accommodation (eg, makeshift accommodation, emergency shelter, and feral), the conditions that put a child at risk of homelessness (eg, war, battle, conflict, refugee, displaced, and migrant), and the general conditions of social distances (eg, poverty, and financial catastrophe) that do not belong to discrimination. We used the Arksey O'Malley framework with Levene's extension in the aforementioned databases and Google Scholar to improve inclusivity. The primary outcomes included access, coverage, and utilisation of child health and nutrition services. The impact measurements included morbidity, mortality, and economic outcomes (return on investment, cost, and efficiency). We applied natural language processing for thematic analysis of qualitative evidence. The analysis was assisted by Python (v3.7.12). Findings We found 53 final articles (47 quantitative and six qualitative) from LMICs. Community-focused and financial interventions were successful in different settings. Financial interventions such as user-fee removal increased health care and service use between 15–309%. Cash transfers increased immunisation coverage, financial security, and nutrition. Mobile health services and the individualised tactics of community midwives and volunteers improved the coverage and use of child health and nutrition services. Community-based savings groups, user-fee removal, and cash transfer policies improved access and utilisation. mHealth applications and capacity building of health workforce increased coverage and quality of these services and improved clinic attendance. Interpretation UK policy makers could adapt and adopt targeted and conditional cash transfer policies to provide greater financial security to homeless families and make child health care more affordable and inclusive. Volunteer and mobile-clinic-based community services would increase access and use of these services in the COVID-19 recovery phase. Our review may have missed matured strategies published before 2010. We were unable to estimate a pooled effect. Funding ESRC, UK Research and Innovation rapid response COVID 19.

Post COVID-19 lockdown 1.0 rapid health services equity assessment for children and young people with special educational needs and disabilities

246 Table 1Describes change in key health measures. 40% of CYP and 43% of parents reported a deterioration in mental health but only 6 families accessed emotional support groups Better Same Worse n/a CYP Mental Health 13% 47% 40% Parent Mental Health 8% 49% 43% CYP Physical Health 19% 48% 33% Parent Physical Health 9% 59% 32% CYP exercise 8% 33% 56% 3% CYP sleep 7% 50% 43% Finance 4% 55% 41% Housing 4% 83% 13% Employment 0% 63% 37% ConclusionsFurther exploration is required with validated measures to understand the impact of the pandemic and of associated interventions (eg lockdown) on health and mental health in particular. Our survey shows that emotional and financial services were not widely used despite the difficulties many faced. Signposting families to these services is being prioritised in our clinical interactions and through development of a social prescribing model. More in-depth qualitative research is planned on this population exploring the interplay between social determinants and COVID in CYP with SEND and their families.

Admissions to a low-resource neonatal unit in Malawi using a mobile app and dashboard: a one year digital perinatal outcome audit

BackgroundNeonatal deaths still account for a large proportion of child deaths. Understanding the extent and characteristics of neonatal deaths in Sub-Saharan Africa is a significant challenge with poor quality, inaccurate record-keeping in these settings. The process of audit is considered the foundation of quality improvement. With mHealth gaining prominence in many hospital departments, the NeoTree data collection and quality improvement system is a digital innovation deployed at Kamuzu Central Hospital (KCH), Neonatal Unit, Malawi, from April 2019, facilitating automated, real-time, prospective audit via a data dashboard.ObjectivesTo describe the pattern of admissions and outcomes in a Malawian neonatal unit over a one-year period via a prototype data dashboard, using a bedside electronic data collection and quality improvement system: NeoTree.MethodsAn electronic audit of admissions to KCH, Neonatal Unit (1st May 2019 to 31st April 2020) was carried out. Data were collected prospectively by nursing staff at the point of care, using electronic forms in the NeoTree app on tablet devices. Admission and outcome forms contained embedded reminders, education and training regarding newborn care according to national and international guidelines. Data were exported from the tablets to a cloud database. The data were then reviewed, visualised, and retrieved via a Microsoft Power BI dashboard. Data cleaning and descriptive statistics were executed using R.ResultsA total of 2732 neonates were admitted and 2413 (88.3%) had an outcome recorded electronically using the NeoTree app. Of 2413 whose outcome was known, 1899 (78.7%) were discharged alive, 12 (0.5%) were referred to another hospital and 10 (0.4%) left the hospital before being discharged. One fifth (n=492) infants died, giving an overall case fatality rate of 204/1000 admissions. Of 492 deaths, the commonest causes of death were prematurity with respiratory distress (n=252, 51%), neonatal sepsis (n=116, 23%), and neonatal encephalopathy (n=80, 16%). Almost half (45%) of deaths occurred within the first 72 hours of admission. The most common perceived modifiable factors around deaths were inadequate monitoring of vital signs and management of sepsis. Monthly trends were tracked in relation to a change in admission criteria and the COVID-19 pandemic. 202 (8.1%) neonates were HIV exposed and 143 (70.8%) of these received nevirapine as prophylaxis leaving 59 (29.2%) vulnerable to vertical infection. Data collected on the NeoTree app were on average 96% complete across all data fields and coverage of admissions, discharges and deaths was 97%, 99% and 91% respectively when compared with the ward logbook.ConclusionsThis is the first electronic, point-of-care audit of neonatal admissions and outcomes to a neonatal unit, collected by health professionals using a mobile app, reported via a data dashboard. This system achieved high coverage and completeness of data over a one-year period suggesting that M-health quality improvement systems such as the NeoTree can provide and improve quality of data for audit, timely reporting, and effective decision making regarding neonatal care in low resource settings, even during significant external stresses such as the COVID-19 pandemic. A larger scale evaluation of impact on quality of care and case fatality rate is planned.

Identifying housing-level barriers to optimal health for Under5s experiencing homelessness: a citizen science approach

BackgroundThe first five years of life are critical for optimal growth, health and cognitive development during which ~90% of brain development occurs. However, many children experience poverty and/or homelessness. Data from 2019 suggested there could be more than 210,000 homeless children in temporary accommodation (TA) or sofa surfing, and ~585,000 who are either homeless or at risk of becoming homeless in England.ObjectivesTo explore the housing environmental barriers to optimal health for children under the age of five (U5s) experiencing homelessness and living in TA.MethodsThe study employed a mixed-methods, participatory design integrating citizen science to identify housing-level barriers to achieving optimal health. Participants were mothers of U5s living in TA, and conveniently sampled at a local charity providing support to U5s experiencing homelessness in Newham, London. Newham has the highest number of children in TA in England (1 in 12 children are homeless) and 1 in 2 children live in poverty. The study had two parts(i) Housing Survey and (ii) House Visits.A housing survey utilised citizen science methodology to collect data including mobile phone images and free text captions to describe the TA housing conditions including those which participants considered as barriers to their child’s health. The survey was first piloted over two weeks on five participants, following refinement based on collaborative feedback and dialogue between the doctoral researcher and study participants. To compliment the housing survey, the doctoral researcher visited the participants’ TA and took observational notes with an audio-recorder and digital photos.A thematic analysis was conducted to triangulate themes across the data. Kingfisher’s Unfit Housing UK Research Report guided the categories for the results. Specific factors explored within these data included ease of access to the property, safety risks, disrepairs, visible structural problems, poor ventilation, temperature control, space (e.g., for a baby to crawl).ResultsIn the Housing Survey, fifteen participants collected data over a period of one month at the end of 2019. In 2019–2020, four House Visits were completed (Pre-COVID), but further visits were cancelled due to the pandemic.Several themes were prominent and overlapped across the Housing Surveys and House Visits, which were noted as risks to child health and development. Thematic categories included (i) overcrowding, (ii) dampness/mould growth, (iii) poor/inadequate kitchen/toilet facilities, (iv) infestations/vermin, (v) structural problems/disrepair, (vi) unsafe electrics, (vii) excessively cold/warm due to inadequate temperature regulation and (viii) unsafe surfaces that risk causing trips or falls.ConclusionsThe Early Years is a short, yet vital period to ensure to the next generation have the best start in life, however U5s in TA face numerous barriers in the housing environment which have significant short- and long-term health impacts. Despite a small sample size, findings are consistent with the Children’s Commissioner ‘Bleak houses’ report and likely to be generalisable across other similar families experiencing homelessness in England.Policy should be enacted to regulate the conditions of TA across England with greater monitoring of and accountability for the safety and regulations to ensure that these environments promote optimal growth and development for U5s.